Rekonstruksi Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Reputasi Institusi Pendidikan dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia: Kajian Normatif terhadap Undang-Undang No. 1 tahun 2023 (KUHP) dan Undang – Undang ITE dalam Perspektif Hukum dan Pendidikan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59947/redominate.v7i2.189Keywords:
Defamation, Educational Ethics, Educational Institutions, Legal Protection, Reputation.Abstract
The development of information technology and the use of social media have increased the potential for defamation against various institutions, including educational institutions. The reputation of schools or educational institutions is an important social asset because it is directly related to public trust, institutional credibility, and the continuity of the educational process. However, the Indonesian legal system still places greater emphasis on protecting individual reputation than institutional reputation, creating a need to reexamine the legal position of educational institutions in responding to attacks on their good name. This study aims to analyze legal protection for the reputation of educational institutions within the Indonesian legal system and to formulate a more comprehensive reconstruction of legal protection that is relevant to the development of digital spaces. This research uses a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. Data sources consist of primary legal materials, including Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of legal literature and educational theory. The results show that defamation provisions in the Criminal Code and the ITE Law have not explicitly provided adequate protection for the reputation of educational institutions. Therefore, legal protection reconstruction is needed through affirming educational institutions as legal subjects whose reputation deserves protection, strengthening reputation recovery mechanisms, and integrating educational ethics perspectives into legal regulation.
References
Agustina, R. (2003). Perbuatan melawan hukum. Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
Anand, G., Putri, D. E. K., & Nugraha, X. (2024). Gugatan perbuatan melanggar hukum aki-bat pencemaran nama baik melalui media elektronik terhadap perseroan terbatas. No-taire, 7(2), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.20473/ntr.v7i2.57309
Bates, A. W. (2019). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
Budiman, A., & Oktaviandra, R. (2026). Analisis hukum terhadap tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik di dunia maya berdasarkan UU ITE. ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora, 4(2).
Davisto, G. R. (2025). Penafsiran konstitusional delik pencemaran nama baik dalam UU ITE: Analisis Putusan MK Nomor 105/PUU-XXII/2024. Sosio Yustisia: Jurnal Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial, 5(2).
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan.
Fuady, M. (2013). Perbuatan melawan hukum: Pendekatan kontemporer. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Harianto. (2021). Cyber law dan tantangan kebebasan berekspresi di era digital. Refika Aditama.
Haryanto, J. C. A. L., & Ginting, R. (2022). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap tindak pidana pemanipulasian dokumen elektronik sehingga dianggap sebagai data yang otentik: Studi Putusan Nomor 155/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Cbn. RECIDIVE: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 11(3), 296–311.
Herlina, S. (2025). Criminal defamation through social media and its legal implications in In-donesia. International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources (INJUR-LENS), 5(1), 83–[halaman akhir perlu dilengkapi].
Herman, Handrawan, Haris, O. K., Hidayat, S., Heryanti, & Sulaeman. (2023). Perlindungan hukum terhadap korporasi atas terjadinya pencemaran nama baik di media elektronik. Halu Oleo Legal Research, 5(1).
Ketaren, A. H. (2024). Juridical review of cybercrime in the criminal act of defamation ac-cording to ITE law and criminal law. International Journal of Society and Law, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.61306/ijsl.v2i1.68
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. (1946).
Kurniawan, K. D., Aunuh, N., & Fajrin, Y. A. (2021). Policy on criminalization of defama-tion offenses through electronic media. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (Vol. 590, pp. 245–250). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211029.052
Kusumaningtyas, H. P., Abunawas, A., & Robekha, J. (2025). Legal analysis of alleged def-amation through social media causing harm to others: Study of Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number 589/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Jkt.Pst. Jurnal Info Sains: Informatika dan Sains, 15(1), 229–240.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2008). Putusan Nomor 50/PUU-VI/2008.
Putra, A., & Nugroho, B. (2023). Implementasi Pasal 27 ayat (3) UU ITE dalam menanggu-langi pencemaran nama baik di media sosial. Jurnal Hukum dan Teknologi, 15(2), 87–102.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum progresif: Sebuah sintesa hukum Indonesia. Genta Publishing.
Samudra, A. H. (2020). Pencemaran nama baik dan penghinaan melalui media teknologi in-formasi komunikasi di Indonesia pasca amandemen UU ITE. Jurnal Hukum & Pem-bangunan, 50(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no1.2484
Sari, Y. S. K., Ablisar, M., Mulyadi, M., & Leviza, J. (2022). Analisis yuridis terhadap tindak pidana manipulasi informasi pengguna e-commerce menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik: Studi Putusan No. 542/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Mlg. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 53–67.
Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolu-tion of three media effects models. Political Communication, 24(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600601056886
Sidharta. (2020). Bahaya pencemaran nama baik di media sosial: Perspektif hukum dan masyarakat. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Sitepu, P. A., & Brahmana, H. (2025). Tinjauan yuridis tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik menurut KUHP dan UU ITE. Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i7.900
Subekti. (2003). Pokok-pokok hukum perdata. Intermasa.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang No-mor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. (2024).
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. (2008).
Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2001 tentang Yayasan jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Ta-hun 2004 tentang Perubahan atas UU Yayasan. (2001).
Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. (2016).
Widodo, C. (2022). Penafsiran delik pencemaran nama baik di era digital. Jurnal Hukum Online, 9(1), 45–61.
Witzleb, N. (2006). The protection of corporations from intrusive media: A German perspec-tive. eLaw Journal: Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, 13, 77–112. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1490962
Wulansari, F. (2019). Pemenuhan hak korporasi sebagai korban tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik. Jurist-Diction, 2(2), 677–696. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v2i2.14206
